04 18 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
02 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Looming risks through the prism of bifurcated housing market
01 11 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Financial risk contagion: China’s capital outflow
12 22 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November PCE: dollar strength weighed on goods inflation
12 14 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
A less-hawkish interpretation of the December FOMC
12 02 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November Payrolls and Governor Powell on risk management
11 15 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
November FOMC minutes and debates behind guidance change
11 04 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
October Payrolls: decent data with stronger wage growth
11 02 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
November FOMC: forward guidance and the return of “some”
11 01 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
September PCE: goods and energy inflation lead the index
09 23 2015 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
How do investors ensure best execution when trading bonds over-the-counter (OTC)?
Over-the-counter (OTC) price transparency and liquidity depends on the type of bonds
Treasury notes and bonds are highly liquid, and there are multiple platforms tracking tick by tick changes in price (and yield). One can either look at or for real time market feeds. There is little question on where the market is trading at the time of execution.
MBS and ABS:
There are multiple dealer platforms that stream dealer desks’ indication prices. I used to run two dealer platforms to get a sense where things are trading. For less liquid MBS (such as specified pools), there are semi-frequent dealer pricing updates on our Bloomberg MSG inbox, which is integrated with other Bloomberg functions such as IMGR inventory runs (you type in a CUSIP or specify criteria, and multiple dealer’s bond inventory as well as rough price indications show up). Overtime traders develop a sense of at what levels bonds are rich / cheap based on current market conditions, which will be compared against dealer quotes with the help of aforementioned indicators.
Corporate bonds (including HY):
Things start to get tricky here. There is , which mandates bond transactions to be posted with a 15 minutes lag. However a lot of the corporate bonds don’t trade often, and the TRACE print may be hours out of date when one needs to execute. Traders in the corporate sector are attuned to corporate headlines and macro risk sentiment (corporate bonds are risk assets), and they generally know whether a corporate spread level is attractive (the “corporate spread” is the difference in yield between corporate bonds and similar duration Treasuries or Swaps, which express a corporate bond’s credit risk).
Muni is a diverse sector. CA GO and big issuers are fairly liquid. Not so for some of the smaller issuers such as XYZ County, New Mexico. Since many buy side institutions simply buy at the primary market (issuance) and tuck bonds in a portfolio for the long haul, a bond may not trade for weeks, even months. For both liquid and illiquid bonds, dealers would send us MSG indications, and traders would use IMGR or just browse through MSG
Institutional traders spend many hours looking at a predefined sector of bonds. An experienced trader would be able to quickly determine relative value. With a level already in mind, price / yield / spread quoted by a dealer would then appear rich or cheap.
Next article09 23 2015 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks