07 12 2019 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
02 27 2019 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Common catalyst for progressive and conservative populism
12 09 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Kekselias performance review: 1.31% YTD total return
10 14 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Roundabout path in the snap-back of long-term bond yields
09 23 2018 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Calm before the storm as quantitative tightening looms
05 20 2018 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Alternative narrative on the natural rate of interest
01 07 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Flatter yield curve a symptom of ineffective tightening
12 04 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Bond market term premium and wolves of Yellowstone
10 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
How we learned to stop worrying and love the “fake markets”
09 20 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
QE’s distributional effects a rising political liability
11 12 2015 | by Victor Xing | Economics
How does microlending reduce poverty?
I was briefly involved with the, and there are a number of examples on how its microlending operations reduced poverty.
Example of how microlending works
Micro-lenders would lend out small amount of money to (mostly) rural borrowers. These are truly small amount of money – $50, $100, $250. In the case of Grameen, these borrowers (predominantly female – more on this later) would use the small amount of cash to buy a sewing machine or some chicken (or a goat), and that would be the foundation of a cash flow generating business. Borrowers will get a shot at acquiring a cash flow that may pay back the loan and grow into larger and more sustaining operations in the future.
The group in #1 is important – it is a way to add “social collateral” to the process. It is easier for one person to default (or run away from the village), but it will be hard for a group of people’s social standing if they let one of their members default.
From a higher level, micro-lending is nothing more than introducing financial services to an area with little or no prior banking presence. Its effect on growth would be similar to banking’s role in developed economies (business owner takes out a loan to buy a fleet of cargo vans for a logistic business).
More about the Grameen model
Back to why Grameen mostly lend to female borrowers in rural areas. This has been a controversial subject, but it was rooted in practicality. Alcoholism and compulsive gambling is common in some rural areas, and participants of such activities have been largely male. Grameen and other micro-lenders argued that direct lending to women can be a form of social empowerment, and they would likely re-distribute their future income in their children and their community (less risk of loans being spent on consumables or at a gambling operation). In turn, Grameen argued that this will be a positive force on reducing overall poverty in an area.
Next article11 11 2015 | by Victor Xing | Economics