01 07 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
12 04 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Bond market term premium and wolves of Yellowstone
10 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
How we learned to stop worrying and love the “fake markets”
09 20 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
QE’s distributional effects a rising political liability
04 18 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Persistent low volatility threatens active fund managers
02 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Looming risks through the prism of bifurcated housing market
01 11 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Financial risk contagion: China’s capital outflow
12 22 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November PCE: dollar strength weighed on goods inflation
12 14 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
A less-hawkish interpretation of the December FOMC
12 02 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November Payrolls and Governor Powell on risk management
11 22 2015 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Does fiscal austerity negate the effectiveness of QE?
Yes indeed, fiscal austerity does offset (but not completely negate) the effectiveness of quantitative easing.
The 2013 budget sequester. A total of 69,000 federal government jobs were lost over the following 21 months, an exceptional scenario given the growth of private sector job gain during that time.
Federal Reserve’s QE3 program officially began one day after the September 13th 2012 FOMC meeting, and it was concluded in October 2014. Unfortunately, negative impacts from the budget sequestration persisted in the real economy despite the Federal Reserve’s unconventional policy measures.
Source: BLS data, aggregated and ranked by
Research by GS economists indicated the following impact of fiscal austerity (budget sequester) on U.S. GDP growth into 2014.
However, the true impact of sequestration went beyond economist expectations, and the impacts were still being felt into late 2014. The Federal Reserve finally removed its language regarding fiscal headwinds in its October 2014 FOMC Statement.
Below is FED Vice Chair Stanley Fischer’s speech in August 2014:, highlighting fiscal headwinds on economic growth.
The stance of U.S. fiscal policy in recent years constituted a significant drag on growth as the large budget deficit was reduced. Historically, fiscal policy has been a support during both recessions and recoveries. In part, this reflects the operation of automatic stabilizers, such as declines in tax revenues and increases in unemployment benefits, that tend to accompany a downturn in activity. In addition, discretionary fiscal policy actions typically boost growth in the years just after a recession. In the U.S., as well as in other countries–especially in Europe–fiscal policy was typically expansionary during the recent recession and early in the recovery, but discretionary fiscal policy shifted relatively fast from expansionary to contractionary as the recovery progressed. In the United States, at the federal level, the end of the payroll tax cut, the sequestration, the squeeze on discretionary spending from budget caps, and the declines in defense spending have all curtailed economic growth. Last year, for example, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that fiscal headwinds slowed the pace of real GDP growth in 2013 by about 1-1/2 percentage points relative to what it would have been otherwise. Moreover, state and local governments, facing balanced budget requirements, have responded to the large and sustained decline in their revenues owing to the deep recession and slow recovery by reducing their purchases of real goods and services. Job cuts at federal, state, and local governments have reduced payrolls by almost 3/4 of a million workers, resulting in a decline in total government civilian employment of 3-1/4 percent since its peak in early 2009.
Next article11 21 2015 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks