08 26 2019 | by Victor Xing | Economics
07 12 2019 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Kekselias portfolio one-year return: 51.5%
02 27 2019 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Common catalyst for progressive and conservative populism
12 09 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Kekselias performance review: 1.31% YTD total return
10 14 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Roundabout path in the snap-back of long-term bond yields
09 23 2018 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Calm before the storm as quantitative tightening looms
05 20 2018 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Alternative narrative on the natural rate of interest
01 07 2018 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Flatter yield curve a symptom of ineffective tightening
12 04 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
Bond market term premium and wolves of Yellowstone
10 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
How we learned to stop worrying and love the “fake markets”
03 04 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
February payrolls: a deep dive into the employment report
Strong job gains vs. slight reversal in wage growth
The highly watched February payrolls came in stronger than expected at 242,000 vs. 190,000 consensus and 172,000 prior (revised up from 151,000). At the same time, combined upward revisions from December and January totaled 30,000. There are a number of encouraging signs within the latest report:
- U-6 (broader) unemployment rate and part-time workers for economic reasons (unable to find full-time work) fell, U-3 held steady despite more entrants into the labor force
- Prime-age unemployment rates (for both female and male) have declined below 2002-2004 levels
- It is worth noting that strong job gains from 2005 and 2006 were fueled by the housing bubble
- Prime-age (25 – 54) and aggregate labor force participation rose rose further
Yet, some areas of concern remain:
- Average hourly earnings came in below expectations (-0.118% MoM vs. 0.2% survey) and reversed some gains from January’s strong reading
- Average workweek fell, and average weekly hours declined to levels last seen during 2014’s “polar vortex” distortion
- Percent of long-term unemployed amongst total unemployed rose further
- Mining sector, especially the “support activities for mining” sub-sector continued to shed payrolls
There are many theories on the inconsistent wage growth, with debates reignited with every monthly fluctuation in average hourly earnings. Fortunately, the payrolls data combined with Bureau of Labor Statistics’ wage estimates provides us an insight into wage dynamics in the U.S..
Wage dynamics within payroll sectors
Few would be surprised to see uneven job growth across payroll sectors, and some market participants have long articulated that a few sectors with brisk hiring also happen to offer lower wages. Below is an analysis on the “guts” of the employment report and their likely impacts on wage growth.
“Trade, transportation and utilities” is the largest non-government payrolls sector on the basis of outright level of payrolls, and many investors are focusing on the higher-wage “professional and business services” sector. A number of skeptical analysts have used job growth in the lower-wage “leisure and hospitality” sector to support their arguments that the labor market is merely optically healthy.
Payroll growth (year-over-year basis) have been relatively stable in majority of sectors with the exception of mining and manufacturing:
Mining and logging
“Support activities for mining” sub-sector is the largest constituent in the “mining and logging” sector. This group include jobs such as “derrick operators, oil and gas,” “first-line supervisors of extraction workers,” “rotary drill operators,” and “roustabouts.” According to BLS’ 2013 wage survey, these workers earned an average of $48,595 per year.
Thus, disappearing disposable income from this sector can have a profound knock-on impacts on business and communities benefited from the oil boom, which may have contributed to the decline in ISM non-manufacturing index – such survey reports tend to focus more on qualitative expectations versus NFP’s emphasis on the quantity of job gains.
Professional and business services
The “professional and business services” sector may first appear to be a high-income category given market attention on lawyers, accountants, management analyst, etc ($101,556 average annual wage in the “professional, scientific, and technical services” sub-sector according to BLS’ 2013 data), but it is essential to highlight that lower-wage administrative and support service workers are also part of this category (thus diluting the argument of strong high-income job growth).
In comparison, “administrative and support services” sub-sector has an annual mean wage of $24,432, and its annual growth mirrors that of “professional, scientific, and technical services.”
Leisure and hospitality
“Food services and drinking places” has been a powerhouse of job creation in recent years, and it is the dominant sub-sector within the “leisure and hospitality” category.
“Food services and drinking places” include fast food workers, restaurant cooks, first-line supervisors and waiting staff. The sub-sector has an annual wage of $20,786 as of 2013.
It is reasonable to argue that current brisk pace of job growth masks a growing income divide amongst job seekers, and a number of these lower income occupations are at-risk from automation. It is true that many workers are willing and able to re-tool, but this process will take time, and wage growth in affected occupations will likely remain soft.
Automation and job polarization
There is one school of thought that wages in sectors such as “administrative and support services” would remain under downward pressure as industries utilize technology to replace middle-skill office workers (i.e. job polarization).
“Nonroutine manual” job growth in the following chart can be explained by growth in sectors with lower wages, and its boosts to wage growth may happen later and at a slower pace than in “nonroutine cognitive” sectors, especially if they account for a large percentage of hiring.
Federal Reserve policymakers have placed strong emphasis on cyclical factors affecting unemployment and underemployment (labor market slack), which can react to accommodative monetary policy measures.
However, if underlying wage growth is in-fact constrained by structural reasons (insensitive to stimulative policy measures), then current reflationary policies would likely have limited effects on wage growth (two-speed wage growth would manifest as below-expectation wage growth on aggregate indices). Under this scenario, an eventual rise in wage growth would likely be accompanied by a secular rise in realized inflation (inflation expectations would trend with energy prices), and the policy battle onward may resemble that of Paul Volcker instead of Ben Bernanke.
Nevertheless, financial market participants would prefer to assess impacts of the latest payroll on near-term Federal Reserve policies, and expectations of less dovish FED policy have erased much of the rally in front-end interest rates seen in the month of February:
Next article03 03 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics