10 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
09 20 2017 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
QE’s distributional effects a political liability
04 18 2017 | by Victor Xing | Capital Markets
Persistent low volatility threatens active fund managers
02 17 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Looming risks through the prism of bifurcated housing market
01 11 2017 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Financial risk contagion: China’s capital outflow
12 22 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November PCE: dollar strength weighed on goods inflation
12 14 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
A less-hawkish interpretation of the December FOMC
12 02 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
November Payrolls and Governor Powell on risk management
11 15 2016 | by Victor Xing | Central Banks
November FOMC minutes and debates behind guidance change
11 04 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
October Payrolls: decent data with stronger wage growth
04 23 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics
Unintentional costs of ultra-easy monetary policy
This is the first of a two part series on unintentional cost of ultra-accommodative monetary policy. The second part can be found at: https://goo.gl/KZIdBI
New York Fed President Dudley recently commented that “real consumer spending growth appears to have moderated somewhat from the relatively robust pace of the second half of 2015” (Dudley, 2016). While this may suggest headwinds from cyclical economic conditions, there are emerging signs that ultra-accommodative policy also acts as a constraint on consumer spending via income effects. Instead of inducing savers to spend and borrow, rapid asset price appreciation as a result of monetary easing have outpaced wage growth, and pass-through services inflation subsequently reduced discretionary income and forced already-levered consumers to save instead of spend. This unintended consequence worked against accommodative policy’s desired substitution effects and suggests further easing would likely yield diminishing results if asset price appreciation continues to outpace real income growth.
Asset price and services inflation outpaced real wage growth
Post 2008 policy accommodation broadly lowered funding costs for consumers and businesses to supported asset price appreciation. However, rising prices have also made assets less affordable, and home buyers “priced out” of their respective housing markets subsequently became involuntary renters (Searcey, 2015). Not only they do not benefit from rising home values, higher education and medical care inflation also outpaced aggregate real wage growth (Chart 1) to weigh on renters’ discretionary spending.
Chart 1: asset price appreciation and pass-through price pressure on services inflation versus nominal wage growth; sources: Bureau of the Census, FHFA, Bureau of Labor Statistics
In response with rising commercial real estate prices (Chart 2), businesses also pass on higher operating costs in the form of services inflation. Year-over-year personal consumption expenditure – services (chain-type price index) has been well-anchored in the 2% range (2.13% in Feb 2016) since 4Q 2011.
Chart 2: CRE prices reached new height in 2015; source: “Composite Price Indices for Commercial Real Estate Soared in 2015,” by the CoStar Group, January 2016 (CoStar Group, 2016)
Another factor constraining consumer spending is the well-publicized effect of student debt burden (Gale, Harris, Renaud, & Rodihan, 2014). This support a view that household spending may be at a lower potential than during prior cycles, thus magnifying the costs of higher services inflation as a result of asset price appreciation.
Consumers redlining their engines: inability to pay $400 emergency expense
Accommodative monetary policy encourages consumers to spend and borrow rather than hoarding cash. However, cash-strapped consumers already facing the pressure of debt burden would likely do neither.
Federal Reserve’s recent Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households (Federal Reserve Board of Governors, 2015) highlighted signs that some consumers are already stretching their spending power to meet existing obligations. 47% of respondents reported that a $400 emergency expense would be “more challenging to handle” (unable to use cash or a credit card that they pay off at the end of the mouth). Results from middle-income household with $40,000 to $100,000 annual income were similarly downbeat, where 44% of respondents indicated difficulties (Chart 3).
Chart 3: Percent of respondents who would completely pay an emergency expense that costs $400 using cash or a credit card that they pay off at the end of the month (by race/ethnicity and household income); source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Survey on health-care expenses was also discouraging. 31% of respondents reported going without some type of medical care in the preceding 12 months due to inability to afford the cost. 45% of those surveyed under a household income of $40,000 reported similar decisions to defer treatment.
Chart 4: During the past 12 months, was there a time when you needed any of the following, but didn’t get it because you couldn’t afford it? Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
In the section “spending relative to income,” Fed researchers reported that one-in-five respondents with spending exceeded their income (leveraged spending). These are signs that consumers were taking advantage of lower rates, but these spending do not appear to be sustainable without corresponding rise in real wage growth.
Chart 5: In the past 12 months, would you say that your household’s total spending was more, less, or the same as your income? (by household income) Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Rising renter cost burden
Another factor constraining discretionary spending is rising renter cost burden. The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies projected a “fairly bleak picture of severe renter burden across the U.S. for the coming decade” (Charette, Herbert, Jakabovics, Marya, & McCue, 2015). The report acknowledged falling incomes among renters and the persisting gap between renter income and renter housing costs (Chart 6), as well as severely burdened renter households (housing costs of more than 50% of household income) reaching 11.8 million in 2015 (Chart 7), or about one in four renters.
Chart 6: renter income vs. renter housing costs; source: Harvard JCH
Chart 7: rising renter cost burden; Source: Harvard JCH
Assuming the correlation between rental price inflation and asset price inflation holds, further declines in housing affordability as a result of policy easing would exacerbate renter burden – one likely needs rising real wages to offset.
Impacts of “long and variable lags” between asset price inflation and real wage growth
Financial market participants play an essential role in the transmission of Federal Reserve’s monetary policy by affecting financial conditions – the following components are part of the GS Financial Conditions Index (Hatzius, Hooper, Mishkin, Schoenholtz, & Watson, 2010)
- Short-term bond yield
- Long-term corporate credit spread
- Stock market variable
- Exchange rate
The Federal Reserve only has effective control of very front-end of the Treasury curve via conventional monetary policy. Nevertheless, unconventional policies such as QE, as well as forward guidance on SOMA principal reinvestments also allow the central bank to affect longer-term funding costs via the expectations and “recruitment channel” (Stein, 2013). Under this mechanism, asset prices take little time to react to changing policy stances, while impacts on income growth and economic conditions would often take longer to manifest.
Such lag between asset price appreciation and changing economic conditions carries a hidden cost – if asset price inflation become well entrenched ahead of broad-based economic growth, those without assets would be penalized just to maintain their life-style, and the reduction in their discretionary spending would serve as a disinflationary drag to Federal Reserve’s effort to reflate the economy.
Inefficiencies within the monetary policy transmission mechanism have resulted in income effects becoming greater than the substitution effects. Under this scenario, ultra-accommodative policy may induce further saving by asset-less consumers to further weigh on aggregate demand. Additionally, policymakers should exercise caution if increasingly aggressive and unconventional reflationary policies do not yield intended results.
Charette, A., Herbert, C., Jakabovics, A., Marya, E. T., & McCue, D. T. (2015). Projecting Trends in Severely Cost-Burdened Renters: 2015–2025. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/KSPProd/ERC_Upload/0100886.pdf
CoStar Group. (2016). Composite Price Indices for Commercial Real Estate Soared in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.costargroup.com/costar-news/details/composite-price-indices-for-commercial-real-estate-soared-in-2015
Dudley, W. C. (2016). The National and Local Economic Outlook: An Update. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Retrieved from https://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2016/dud160408
Federal Reserve Board of Governors. (2015). Report on the Economic Well-Being. Retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/2014-report-economic-well-being-us-households-201505.pdf
Gale, W., Harris, B., Renaud, B., & Rodihan, K. (2014). Student Loans Rising, An Overview of Causes, Consequences, and Policy Options. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2014/05/student%20loan%20debt%20rising%20gale%20harris/student_loans_rising_gale_harris_09052014.pdf
Hatzius, J., Hooper, P., Mishkin, F., Schoenholtz, K. L., & Watson, M. W. (2010). Financial Conditions Indexes: A Fresh Look after the Financial Crisis . Retrieved from https://research.chicagobooth.edu/igm/events/docs/2010usmpfreport.pdf
Searcey, D. (2015). More Americans are Renting, and Paying More, as Homeownership Falls. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/24/business/economy/more-americans-are-renting-and-paying-more-as-homeownership-falls.html?_r=1
Stein, J. C. (2013). Speech at the “Banking, Liquidity and Monetary Policy,” a Symposium Sponsored by the Center for Financial Studies, Frankfurt, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/stein20130926a.htm
Next article04 14 2016 | by Victor Xing | Economics